Perhaps instead of condemning me for considering the negatives, TEM, you might consider why it is that our enemies would want to blow up buildings in the first place? Surely striving to research better ways to live in peace is better than trying to build a bigger and more powerful gun. Do you think that someday we'll invent the most powerful gun ever and suddenly there will be world peace? Maybe if one or the other side wins the war there'll be peace, because of course thats worked so many times in the past. If violence is the answer, then why haven't we solved the problem yet?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Greg Poole @ Oct 18th 2007 3:21AM
Perhaps instead of condemning me for considering the negatives, TEM, you might consider why it is that our enemies would want to blow up buildings in the first place? Surely striving to research better ways to live in peace is better than trying to build a bigger and more powerful gun. Do you think that someday we'll invent the most powerful gun ever and suddenly there will be world peace? Maybe if one or the other side wins the war there'll be peace, because of course thats worked so many times in the past. If violence is the answer, then why haven't we solved the problem yet?
As for Shaocaholica, I misread the article, sorry. As for there not being any autonomous lethal robots, I beg to differ: http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=2504508&page=1